PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Revenue growth below 50% of MPWR's 30.83%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.06%
Cost growth less than half of MPWR's 23.32%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MPWR's 36.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Margin expansion below 50% of MPWR's 4.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.03%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 6.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.41%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 409.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.11%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 136.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
D&A growth less than half of MPWR's 50.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
7.91%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.61%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.98%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.67%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.33%
Other expenses growth while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.95%
Income change of 14.95% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
14.63%
Margin change of 14.63% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-16.02%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
27.66%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.31%
Net margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.00%
EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.93%
Share count reduction while MPWR shows 1.67% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 1.67% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.