205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.41%
Revenue growth below 50% of MPWR's 17.21%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.67%
Cost growth less than half of MPWR's 17.87%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.40%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 16.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.06%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 13.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.48%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 28.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.15%
Total costs growth less than half of MPWR's 23.61%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
D&A growth less than half of MPWR's 7.06%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
2.84%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.41%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MPWR's 15.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.22%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.79%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-48.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.19%
Pre-tax income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.19%
Tax expense growth while MPWR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.20%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.53%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.52%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 0.95% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.