205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.07%
Revenue growth below 50% of MPWR's 17.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.86%
Cost growth less than half of MPWR's 18.38%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-6.06%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 17.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.89%
R&D growth less than half of MPWR's 9.51%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.88%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MPWR's 2.93%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.96%
Similar D&A growth to MPWR's 2.11%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-7.54%
EBITDA decline while MPWR shows 145.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.52%
EBITDA margin decline while MPWR shows 11.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.44%
Operating income decline while MPWR shows 145.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Operating margin decline while MPWR shows 108.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.18%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.06%
Pre-tax income decline while MPWR shows 117.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while MPWR shows 84.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.34%
Tax expense reduction while MPWR shows 9.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.25%
Net income decline while MPWR shows 127.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.27%
Net margin decline while MPWR shows 92.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.44%
EPS decline while MPWR shows 121.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.27%
Diluted EPS decline while MPWR shows 123.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.21%
Share count reduction while MPWR shows 1.93% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.72%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 1.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.