205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.74%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 6.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.06%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.10%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 5.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.38%
Margin expansion while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.38%
R&D growth while MPWR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.49%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.14%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 6.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.83%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 6.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.90%
D&A reduction while MPWR shows 0.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.57%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.30%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.77%
Operating income growth below 50% of MPWR's 32.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.19%
Similar operating margin growth to MPWR's 24.70%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-105.88%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 7.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.02%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MPWR's 31.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.99%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of MPWR's 23.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
94.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of MPWR's 442.11%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-11.07%
Net income decline while MPWR shows 22.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.55%
Net margin decline while MPWR shows 14.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.54%
EPS decline while MPWR shows 25.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
Diluted EPS decline while MPWR shows 11.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.62%
Share count reduction below 50% of MPWR's 1.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 4.20%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.