205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.12%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-7.03%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-16.95%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.21%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 10.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2925.00%
Other expenses growth while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.22%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MPWR's 14.69%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.37%
Total costs growth while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while MPWR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.06%
D&A reduction while MPWR shows 2.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-58.44%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
433.33%
Other expenses growth while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-81.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-284.75%
Tax expense reduction while MPWR shows 30.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-66.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.18%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.50%
Share count reduction while MPWR shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.49%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 0.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.