205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.47%
Revenue growth below 50% of MPWR's 13.23%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.81%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 12.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
13.31%
Similar gross profit growth to MPWR's 14.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
6.43%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 0.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.40%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 1.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.04%
Other expenses growth while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.81%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MPWR's 1.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.10%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MPWR's 6.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.95%
D&A growth 50-75% of MPWR's 8.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-5.05%
EBITDA decline while MPWR shows 56.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.82%
EBITDA margin decline while MPWR shows 5.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.84%
Operating income decline while MPWR shows 76.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
Operating margin decline while MPWR shows 55.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.48%
Pre-tax income decline while MPWR shows 67.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while MPWR shows 47.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.77%
Tax expense reduction while MPWR shows 432.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.70%
Net income decline while MPWR shows 35.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.48%
Net margin decline while MPWR shows 19.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.08%
EPS decline while MPWR shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
Diluted EPS decline while MPWR shows 35.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.63%
Share count reduction while MPWR shows 2.31% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 2.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.