205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.49%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.86%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.01%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.78%
R&D growth less than half of MPWR's 24.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.68%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 433.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.78%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 21.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.05%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 7.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.17%
Interest expense change of 4.17% while MPWR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-17.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.20%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of MPWR's 13.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.95%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MPWR's 19.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-280.00%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 433.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.61%
Pre-tax income decline while MPWR shows 16.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while MPWR shows 22.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.60%
Tax expense growth while MPWR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.70%
Net income decline while MPWR shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.26%
Net margin decline while MPWR shows 27.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
EPS decline while MPWR shows 15.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Diluted EPS decline while MPWR shows 21.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while MPWR shows 0.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.