205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.06%
Revenue growth below 50% of MPWR's 6.82%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.88%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 6.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.38%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MPWR's 6.69%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
2.27%
Margin expansion while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.26%
R&D growth less than half of MPWR's 8.20%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.17%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.39%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 9.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.79%
Interest expense change of 15.79% while MPWR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
3.49%
D&A growth less than half of MPWR's 14.87%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.09%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.88%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.21%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.01%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
Other expenses growth while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.95%
Pre-tax income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.73%
Pre-tax margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.63%
Tax expense growth less than half of MPWR's 247.37%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
7.23%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.07%
Net margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.98%
EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.94%
Diluted EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while MPWR shows 0.84% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 0.55% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.