205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.20%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 0.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.86%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 1.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.82%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 0.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.91%
R&D growth 50-75% of MPWR's 6.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.91%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 10.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.64%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 5.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.37%
Interest expense growth while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.42%
D&A growth while MPWR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.69%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.21%
Tax expense growth while MPWR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.46%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.22%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 1.46%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.