205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.55%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MPWR's 2.56%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
3.72%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 2.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-0.04%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 2.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.57%
Margin decline while MPWR shows 0.01% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.30%
R&D growth 50-75% of MPWR's 7.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MPWR's 1.86%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
4.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MPWR's 2.28%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.54%
Interest expense reduction while MPWR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.07%
D&A growth while MPWR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.85%
Operating income decline while MPWR shows 3.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.31%
Operating margin decline while MPWR shows 0.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.11%
Pre-tax income decline while MPWR shows 2.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.54%
Pre-tax margin decline while MPWR shows 0.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.01%
Tax expense reduction while MPWR shows 103.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.54%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.