205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.37%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
25.34%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-66.29%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-59.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-59.57%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.57%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.36%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-123.01%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.44%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.74%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
120.50%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.93%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
188.89%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-63.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.12%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.12%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.