205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.65%
Similar revenue growth to MRVL's 4.29%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
1.61%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 4.77%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
12.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.38%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.28%
Similar total costs growth to MRVL's 2.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.67%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
146.88%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
145.23%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1050.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1016.58%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-104.35%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.29%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.30%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.