205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.53%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
8.23%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-4.88%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.99%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-133.33%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-115.79%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.96%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-133.33%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.71%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-163.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-160.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-220.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-220.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.25%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.25%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.