205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.70%
Similar revenue growth to MRVL's 4.29%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-33.41%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
171.79%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
159.59%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.90%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.89%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
450.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-560.00%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-530.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1233.33%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1173.45%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-366.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-800.00%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-759.58%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-700.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-664.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-445.24%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-445.24%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.04%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.