205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.12%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-39.23%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
223.36%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
213.58%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.01%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.93%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MRVL's 2.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
17.65%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.14%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.15%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
33.23%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
39.13%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.33%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
35.35%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.78%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.05%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.80%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.80%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.90%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.90%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.