205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.31%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
52.89%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-58.24%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-56.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-66.92%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.09%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
223.81%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
228.05%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
250.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
255.14%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
212.50%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
216.35%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-20.69%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
147.06%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.67%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.23%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.23%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-29.30%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-29.30%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.