205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.34%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 4.29%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.62%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 4.77%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 3.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.36%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.13%
Similar total costs growth to MRVL's 2.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.38%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.38%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.57%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.37%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-19.27%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.33%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.22%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.76%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.