205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.02%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
-35.60%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
134.81%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.59%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
182.39%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.52%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.59%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.59%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.24%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
89.29%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.00%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.02%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.45%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
35.09%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.63%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.32%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.32%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.