205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.18%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
51.62%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-54.96%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-52.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-64.38%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.94%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.01%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.73%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.89%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
30.67%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-266.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
17.27%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.68%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
33.33%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.19%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.95%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.97%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.97%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.