205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.66%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-0.32%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
11.13%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.25%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.57%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 2.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
225.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
32.12%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
28.70%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.01%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.75%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-450.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.98%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.97%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-12.28%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.36%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.98%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.46%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.46%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.