205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.86%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
13.34%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 3.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1800.77%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-351.72%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-260.00%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3225.23%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2926.88%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3232.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2933.56%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-32004.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.06%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 8.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-8.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.38%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
16.37%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.