205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.16%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
1.59%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 4.77%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
7.64%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.35%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
106.81%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
145.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.25%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-97.12%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.12%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.21%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
99.93%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.99%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 8.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.45%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.75%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.69%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.80%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.31%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.