205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.49%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
0.84%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 4.77%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.35%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.98%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
39.71%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.32%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
39.71%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.32%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-200.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.78%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
32.48%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
32.86%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
37.31%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.98%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.82%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.55%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.