205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.55%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
2.77%
Cost growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
1.98%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MRVL's 3.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.61%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.93%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 2.65%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.67%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.34%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.34%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.82%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
33.33%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.44%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 8.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.15%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.09%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.33%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.53%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.43%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.