205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.08%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
9.61%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.16%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 3.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-3.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1883.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-347.83%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-418.18%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2788.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2572.37%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2800.34%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2583.50%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-81510.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.71%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.21%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.08%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.25%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.