205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.88%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-6.26%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
27.53%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.96%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
108.00%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.50%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-95.91%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-96.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.92%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-96.04%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.05%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.73%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
21.24%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.67%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
22.34%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.92%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.19%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.28%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.