205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.78%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
8.10%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
1.19%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 3.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.79%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.74%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.40%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
12.53%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.39%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.44%
Operating income growth 50-75% of MRVL's 15.99%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
2.52%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 5.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-185.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.12%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of MRVL's 8.06%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.58%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
3.96%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.56%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.59%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.84%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.