205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.20%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
10.72%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-6.44%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.46%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.89%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-416.67%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.30%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.41%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.03%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
450.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.23%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.16%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.11%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.69%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.26%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.26%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.57%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.27%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.