205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.33%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 4.29%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.22%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 4.77%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
90.64%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.74%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.03%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.54%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.50%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-542.50%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-541.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-231.58%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.14%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-244.57%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-244.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.25%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-293.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-292.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.42%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.10%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.51%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.