205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.88%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.50%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.46%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
169.45%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.74%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.97%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.69%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.97%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-181.54%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-183.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-155.87%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-157.52%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
340.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-142.39%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-143.65%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.05%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-116.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-117.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.07%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.87%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.32%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.