205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.31%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
1.26%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 4.77%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
3.64%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 3.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
1.30%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.68%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.74%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.42%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.08%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 2.65%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.86%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.14%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.33%
Operating income growth 50-75% of MRVL's 15.99%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
7.84%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
366.67%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.17%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.35%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.40%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
34.92%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.88%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-29.56%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-27.87%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.