205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.42%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
6.96%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-0.96%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.11%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.89%
Other expenses change of 188.89% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.35%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-135.38%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.25%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.38%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.97%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
187.50%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.68%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.16%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.21%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
21.82%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.33%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.86%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.55%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.