205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.28%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 4.77%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
16.17%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.69%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.71%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.96%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.62%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.68%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
42.76%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.19%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.17%
Similar operating income growth to MRVL's 15.99%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.84%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.86%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.68%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 8.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.72%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.43%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.27%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.33%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.70%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.53%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.