205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.34%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
3.20%
Cost growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
1.44%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 3.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
18.99%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.74%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.73%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 2.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.39%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.49%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.27%
Operating income growth 50-75% of MRVL's 15.99%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.78%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
28.92%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.03%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
9.48%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
57.46%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-7.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.85%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.29%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.04%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.