PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.97%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
4.65%
Similar cost growth to MRVL's 4.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
4.03%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 3.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
1.03%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.25%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.00%
Other expenses change of 150.00% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.78%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.62%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-981.45%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-280.40%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-275.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.45%
Similar operating income growth to MRVL's 15.99%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.21%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1139.25%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
198.18%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
189.58%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
217.06%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
207.84%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
198.96%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
204.00%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.94%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.32%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.