205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.15%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.25%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.74%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
23.10%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.69%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.87%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
95.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
95.61%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.93%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.46%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-45.31%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.79%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.36%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.68%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.47%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.07%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.