205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.30%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.38%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.22%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.09%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-17.26%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.60%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.97%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.50%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
1060.00%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1103.17%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.09%
Similar operating income growth to MRVL's 15.99%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
20.27%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-53.10%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-19.57%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.62%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.56%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.73%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.08%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.