205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.42%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 8.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.20%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 14.42%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-49.76%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-37.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.62%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 27.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.27%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 22.12%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.57%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 18.38%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.42%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.18%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-76.74%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-230.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-261.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.85%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 230.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-180.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-199.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.56%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-185.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-206.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.62%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.23%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 18.10%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.23%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 6.20%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.