205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.98%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 6.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
8.19%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 6.59%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
-2.45%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 6.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.72%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 10.20%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.57%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.15%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.58%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.24%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-7.84%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 15.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.37%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 8.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.68%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 0.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.37%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 6.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
213.16%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.91%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.94%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 6.16%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-263.64%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
97.89%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
90.32%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 6.16%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
120.00%
EPS change of 120.00% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
120.00%
Diluted EPS change of 120.00% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-10.05%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.94% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-10.05%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.94% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.