205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.71%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 21.15%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.92%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 27.99%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.74%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 15.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.92%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 9.77%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.06%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.58%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.87%
D&A growth 50-75% of MRVL's 3.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-3.98%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 557.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.02%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 15.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.30%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 70.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.44%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 75.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2500.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.95%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 74.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.11%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 79.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.92%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 35.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.42%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 69.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.08%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 75.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.67%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.42%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.67%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.