PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.36%
Similar revenue growth to MRVL's 10.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
4.86%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 11.72%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
15.92%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 10.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.00%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.27%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 10.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.20%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 29.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.10%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 21.71%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 81.97%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
31.38%
Similar EBITDA growth to MRVL's 35.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
20.14%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
75.90%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.85%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
46.09%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
176.19%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 15.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
14.77%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.95%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.74%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
51.98%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.