205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.30%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 10.13%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
5.53%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 15.96%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.98%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.13%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.56%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.18%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 22.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.88%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 21.22%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.14%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 18.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.03%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 34.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
13.59%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.86%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.97%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.87%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.59%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.31%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.12%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.65%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.22%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.17%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.07%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.