205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.98%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.38%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.21%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.95%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.63%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 0.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.41%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 8.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.34%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.68%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 6.81%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
18.68%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.93%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.22%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.05%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.36%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 527.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.24%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.20%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.71%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.21%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.91%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.95%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.57%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.39%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.43%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.