205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.41%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 3.41%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
5.67%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-0.40%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 4.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.75%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 0.96% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.06%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 0.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.48%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 4.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.15%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MRVL's 3.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.84%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.41%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.22%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.79%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-48.48%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 21.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.19%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
47.19%
Similar tax expense growth to MRVL's 61.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-11.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.20%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.53%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.52%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.