205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.07%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 15.46%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.86%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 18.08%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-6.06%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 12.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.89%
R&D growth 50-75% of MRVL's 6.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 2.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.88%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MRVL's 9.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.96%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.81%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-7.54%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 147.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.52%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 114.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.44%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 83.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 86.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.18%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.06%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 73.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 76.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.34%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.25%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 88.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.27%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 90.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.44%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 88.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.27%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 88.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.21%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.55% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.72%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.55% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.