205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.26%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.18%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-26.53%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 2.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.26%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 7.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.44%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.66%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-23.97%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.95%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.09%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.27%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 157.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.54%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 172.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-80.00%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 494.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.12%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 513.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
135.71%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-58.33%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 3903.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.24%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 4096.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
97.18%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 355.41%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-84.11%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 5309.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.03%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 5582.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.89%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 5354.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.89%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 4900.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.47%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 1.85% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.62%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 5.77% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.