205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.79%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.79%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.14%
Similar cost growth to MRVL's 4.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
39.45%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.16%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.40%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.40%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 4.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.05%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.88%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 7.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.83%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 5.80%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.92%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
86.20%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.08%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3330.00%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2812.08%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 80.95%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2273.33%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1914.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4900.00%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1429.41%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1198.47%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2000.00%
EPS change of 2000.00% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1900.00%
Diluted EPS change of 1900.00% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.63%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.94% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.39%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 2.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.