205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.22%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.95%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
31.76%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.41%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.27%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.24%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.14%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.72%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
51.59%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.32%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
122.45%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.78%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-84.62%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 1630.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
114.89%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 10.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
83.33%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 17.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.46%
Similar tax expense growth to MRVL's 164.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
106.92%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.53%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.76%
EPS change of 104.76% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
110.00%
Diluted EPS change of 110.00% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.95%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.84% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.