PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.66%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.67%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
7.06%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
6.29%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.52%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.50%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 14.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.87%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MRVL's 8.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.67%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.57%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.80%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 63.64%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.63%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.85%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.30%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 142.85%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.46%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 1.63% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.11%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.