205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.75%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.70%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-8.29%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 8.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.69%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 3.84% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.00%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 0.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3650.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.18%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 1.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.67%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.25%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.55%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 18.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.68%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 13.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.24%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 21.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.36%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 15.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
125.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 846.47%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.05%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 28.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.22%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 22.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-18.62%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 134.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.66%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.60%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.35%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.27%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.13%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.45%
Diluted EPS change of 8.45% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1.01%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.59%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.